Fluffiest Gets Fluffier

Topics:
 

    •  The Current State

     The Problem
     New InsulSafe 4

    • Even worse than insulsafe III

    • The Solution

 
 
  InsulSafe 4 is actually less dense than InsulSafe III!
With the new fiberglass products there was hope that improvements might have been made.
Problems with blown fiberglass have been known since at least 1982.
graph

CertainTeed Replaces The Notorious InsulSafe III With InsulSafe 4 

The Current State
A new generation of fiberglass is available and there was hope that improvements might have been made to the new products.

It has long been known that properly installed fiberglass loses up to 50% of it’s effectiveness under certain conditions(1) and that in 79% of homes it isn’t even installed properly(2). For years, insulation contractors have confirmed that fiberglass is very susceptible to fluffing (pumping the insulation full of air during installation), and have urged fiberglass manufacturers to improve the performance of their products. InsulSafe III - “The Fluffers’ Delight”(3)

The national association of insulation contractors eventually became so frustrated with fiberglass manufacturers that they decided to conduct their own independent tests to determine the “fluffability” of fiberglass. The Insulation Contractors Association of America conducted over 800 tests, 234 of these were on InsulSafe.(4) The result? Confirmation that fiberglass is extremely susceptible to fluffing and losing it’s R-value. In particular, InsulSafe III was found to be “the fluffers’ delight”.(5)

“The InsulSafe tests showed 15% average overblow with some tests as high as 40%.”(6)

This vividly demonstrated that fiberglass - especially InsulSafe III - desperately needed to be improved if it was to deliver the performance promised to homeowners.

The Problem:
Density Fiberglass’ problems are simple: too much air and too little (fiberglass) insulation. And they can be solved easily: install denser fiberglass that contains less air.

When there is too much air in the insulation, convective air currents can move freely through the fiberglass and can diminish the R-value by up to 50% under certain conditions.

New InsulSafe 4
CertainTeed has known for many years that InsulSafe III allows easy air movement and that higher density InsulSafe would help reduce the problem. Many in the industry hoped that CertainTeed would remedy the problem with an improved product. Years passed without any action. Finally, CertainTeed announced InsulSafe 4 and there was hope.

Even Worse Than InsulSafe III!
But insulation contractors, builders, and building scientists were dismayed to learn that InsulSafe 4 is actually less dense than InsulSafe III! How can this be? CertainTeed knows there is a problem. They know how to fix it. But they made it worse!

Who benefits from a fluffier InsulSafe? Not the homeowner. Not the builder. Only CertainTeed benefits by claiming that an attic can be insulated with even less fiberglass than before. In other words, they are saying that homeowners can get the same R-value by using even less of their product, when they know the performance wasn’t there in the first place.

Unwitting buyers who compare bids for various products at the same R-value will not realize that InsulSafe 4 may suffer the same significant loss of performance that plagued InsulSafe III.

The Solution: Cellulose Insulation
The graph to the top right clearly shows why insulation products like Applegate Stabilized outperform blown fiberglass - they are much more dense and resist air movement.

The same research that uncovered the severe performance degradation of fiberglass was performed on cellulose. The result? Cellulose holds it own! In fact, cellulose “allows no convective patterns to develop” and its “R-values increased” during cold weather testing. Cellulose is “immune to the problem”.

For new homes, the choice is clear: cellulose insulation. But what about existing homes insulated with loose-fill fiberglass? The researchers found another striking reaction. Covering the fiberglass with cellulose not only adds the R-value of additional insulation, it stops the convective air movement and helps restore the fiberglass’ lost R-value!

 ———————————
For more information on getting the R-value you pay for or for additional copies of this article, please call: 800-627-7536 or email: CIJournal@aol.com

———————————
Sources (1) Energy Design Update, “Loose-Fill Fiberglass Versus Cellulose in Cold Attics”,. (2) Insulation Contractors Report, “Independent Investigation Urges Adjustments in Attic Coverage Charts”, . (3) Energy Design Update; “Blowing Wool ‘Fluffability’”;  (4-6) Ibid. InsulSafe III and (4) densities from CertainTeed Corp. Cellulose Stabilized density from Applegate Insulation.

In a Nutshell...

Cellulose
The R-factor of cellulose insulation is approximately 3.8 per inch and it does not vary significantly over a wide range of densities. In an attic, 10 inches of cellulose insulation will have an R-value of about R-38, regardless of the density of the material. "Fluffing" cellulose by adding excessive air during installation does not change the R-factor of the insulation, so it is easy for an inspector or home owner to check the R-value of the installation. As long as the insulation maintains the required thickness it will have the specified R-value. In addition to maintaining R-value over a wide density range, cellulose insulation also maintains R-value under cold conditions. At an attic temperature of 20o F below zero the R-value of cellulose insulation is higher than at 70o above zero. It's important to emphasize that while R-value is important, many other factors are nearly as significant in determining the real world thermal performance of buildings. Focusing on R-value to the exclusion of these can lead to poorly-performing buildings. Not only is fiberglass bad for the environment and a carcinogen, it simply isn't a Better Insulation.

The R-factor of cellulose insulation is approximately 3.8 per inch and it does not vary significantly over a wide range of densities. In an attic, 10 inches of cellulose insulation will have an R-value of about R-38, regardless of the density of the material. "Fluffing" cellulose by adding excessive air during installation does not change the R-factor of the insulation, so it is easy for an inspector or home owner to check the R-value of the installation. As long as the insulation maintains the required thickness it will have the specified R-value. In addition to maintaining R-value over a wide density range, cellulose insulation also maintains R-value under cold conditions. At an attic temperature of 20o F below zero the R-value of cellulose insulation is higher than at 70o above zero. It's important to emphasize that while R-value is important, many other factors are nearly as significant in determining the real world thermal performance of buildings. Focusing on R-value to the exclusion of these can lead to poorly-performing buildings. Not only is fiberglass bad for the environment and a carcinogen, it simply isn't a Better Insulation.
Fiber Glass
Fiber glass R-value changes with density. Light, fluffy blown-in fiber glass may have an R-factor of 2.2 per inch, or less; high density glass batts may have an R-factor of 4.0 per inch. The dishonest practice of "fluffing" blown-in fiber glass both reduces the R-factor of the material and increases the amount of settlement that will occur. Depending on the density of the material, 12 inches of blown fiber glass may have an R-value anywhere between R-26 and R-38. Under winter conditions the R-value of fiber glass is further reduced. The actual R-value of blown-in fiber glass in an extremely cold attic may be 30, 40, or even 50 percent lower than the purchaser thought he was buying. The more you need it the less insulating performance it delivers. The stated R-value of fiber glass batts is based on full thickness. Batts stuffed into wall cavities are often compressed to less than full thickness and lose R-value.

Fiber glass R-value changes with density. Light, fluffy blown-in fiber glass may have an R-factor of 2.2 per inch, or less; high density glass batts may have an R-factor of 4.0 per inch. The dishonest practice of "fluffing" blown-in fiber glass both reduces the R-factor of the material and increases the amount of settlement that will occur. Depending on the density of the material, 12 inches of blown fiber glass may have an R-value anywhere between R-26 and R-38. Under winter conditions the R-value of fiber glass is further reduced. The actual R-value of blown-in fiber glass in an extremely cold attic may be 30, 40, or even 50 percent lower than the purchaser thought he was buying. The more you need it the less insulating performance it delivers. The stated R-value of fiber glass batts is based on full thickness. Batts stuffed into wall cavities are often compressed to less than full thickness and lose R-value.
   

BACK       HOME       Photos of one FRAUD BUSTERS discovery!